On 21.06.2010, at 02:19, Mark Engelberg wrote:

> The arguments seem to be winding down, so I thought this would be a
> good time to summarize my thoughts.
> 
> My favorite option of those proposed is:
> +, *, -, inc, dec auto-promote.
> loop/recur is changed so that primitive bindings are boxed.
> +',*',-',inc',dec' give error upon overflow.
> A new construct, loop', is introduced that doesn't box primitives and
> enforces recur with primitive upon penalty of error.

My preference is the same, for pretty much the same reasons.

Konrad.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to