On 30 June 2010 06:33, cageface <milese...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 29, 12:54 pm, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > > Indeed, there are many nontrivial personas that actively wish for a > > smaller (or at least not maximally large), more exclusive community. > > Only a fool would actively wish for a smaller community. Some of just > recognize that selling a sports car to grandma might not be in her or > our best interests. > > Make Clojure as easy as possible for the beginner as long as you don't > make it less useful for the expert in the process.
I swear, step by step Clojure is falling into the Common Lisp death spiral. As usual, too, it's the community at fault, not the creator. Are you *trying* to evoke the "Smug Lisp Weenie" vibe, cageface, or is this just a natural byproduct of being a burgeoning Smug Clojure Weenie? -- "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions of entering China our focus has really been what's best for the Chinese people. It's not been about our revenue or profit or whatnot." --Sergey Brin, demonstrating the emptiness of the "don't be evil" mantra. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
