What test failures are you seeing? I'm not seeing any building
github.com/clojure/clojure-contrib 1.2.0-RC3
(e4ea06c9ff93df3b3f667ab5768618ece5a98b6e).

Ran 365 tests containing 1298 assertions.
0 failures, 0 errors.
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL

// Ben

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 15:25, Michael Jaaka
<michael.ja...@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Agree with Daniel Janus. There are some conflicts without any reason.
> This should be cleaned up for 1.2.1 version.
> More over when I build clojure-contrib-1.2.jar I get 4 failures on
> tests due to. It shouldn't appear in a final versions.
> All contributors and Rick do a great job but you should think about
> some QA.
>
> On 27 Sie, 15:20, B Smith-Mannschott <bsmith.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 13:54, Daniel Janus <nath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > so I finally got around to port my app to Clojure 1.2 and got confused
> > > about the contrib shuffles.
> >
> > > There's clojure.java.io and clojure.contrib.io. The docs on the latter
> > > says that most of the functions defined in there are deprecated, and
> > > one should use clojure.java.io instead. But clojure.java.io lacks some
> > > of the very useful macros and function I'm using, like with-in-reader,
> > > with-out-writer, slurp*, to name but a few; clojure.contrib.io does
> > > have them, but it relies on its own primitives, instead of building on
> > > clojure.java.io. So in a way I'm committed to using (if indirectly)
> > > code that is already deprecated. What are the plans for contrib
> > > development in this case?
> >
> > with-out-writer and with-in-reader do indeed seem to be missing. By hand,
> > this would be e.g.
> >
> > (with-open [r (io/reader x)]
> >   (binding [*in* r]
> >     (read)))
> >
> > But that seems like the kind of boiler-plate a macro or function should
> be
> > provided for...
> >
> > > On a side note: shouldn't slurp* and slurp be unified somehow in a
> > > future release?
> >
> > The slurp in clojure 1.2 corehttp://
> clojure.github.com/clojure/clojure.core-api.html#clojure.core/...
> > now properly supports encoding by passing :encoding. For example:
> >
> > (slurp path :encoding "UTF-8")
> >
> > > Also, contrib 1.2's str-utils contains the following confusing comment
> > > at the very top:
> >
> > > ;; DEPRECATED in 1.2: Promoted to clojure.java.string. Note that
> > > ;; many function names and semantics have changed
> >
> > I believe clojure.string (in Clojure 1.2.0) is what was meant.
> >
> >
> >
> > > whereas there's no such thing as clojure.java.string.
> >
> > > Daniel
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> > > your first post.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to