Thanks Armando for catching my stupid mistake. That fixed everything. Meikel, I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. When I evaluate this in the REPL
(for [x (range 2) y (range 2)] (aset xt x y (+ x y))) (aget xt 0 0) (aget xt 1 1) I get back 0 and 2 as I expect. Isn't the call to aset consuming the lazy sequence? Thanks. On Sep 13, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13 Sep., 15:07, Ranjit Chacko <rjcha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (for [x (range 3) y (range 3)] (aset xt x y 1)) > > Note that that this will not do what you think it does. for creates a > lazy sequence which is thrown away immediately. So the aset calls are > never done. for is a list comprehension, not a looping construct. > Replace for with doseq. As a rule of thumb: side-effects => command > starting in "do". > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
