The REPL automatically realizes the lazy sequence in the process of
printing it out, but if you try to us

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Ranjit <rjcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Armando for catching my stupid mistake. That fixed everything.
>
> Meikel, I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. When I evaluate
> this in the REPL
>
> (for [x (range 2) y (range 2)] (aset xt x y (+ x y)))
> (aget xt 0 0)
> (aget xt 1 1)
>
> I get back 0 and 2 as I expect. Isn't the call to aset consuming the
> lazy sequence?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Sep 13, 11:00 am, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 13 Sep., 15:07, Ranjit Chacko <rjcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >     (for [x (range 3) y (range 3)] (aset xt x y 1))
>>
>> Note that that this will not do what you think it does. for creates a
>> lazy sequence which is thrown away immediately. So the aset calls are
>> never done. for is a list comprehension, not a looping construct.
>> Replace for with doseq. As a rule of thumb: side-effects => command
>> starting in "do".
>>
>> Sincerely
>> Meikel
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to