>> What is it I get wrong?

As the others said, you have no expressions being evaluated in the
body of let and hence you get nil. The way I understand let is that
you define some bindings to be used in the body of let which will
cease to exist (if they didn't exist before the let expression) after
the whole let expression (new bindings and expressions in the body)
have been evaluated.

So:

user => k ; doesn't exist
Unable to resolve symbol: k in this context

user => (let [k 2] (+ k 1)) ; 3 since k has been bound to 2 in let
3

user => k ; still doesn't exist
Unable to resolve symbol: k in this context

U

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to