k is not global binding so it does not resolve let helps to define local binding
thanks Abraham On Oct 10, 2:09 pm, Ulises <ulises.cerv...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What is it I get wrong? > > As the others said, you have no expressions being evaluated in the > body of let and hence you get nil. The way I understand let is that > you define some bindings to be used in the body of let which will > cease to exist (if they didn't exist before the let expression) after > the whole let expression (new bindings and expressions in the body) > have been evaluated. > > So: > > user => k ; doesn't exist > Unable to resolve symbol: k in this context > > user => (let [k 2] (+ k 1)) ; 3 since k has been bound to 2 in let > 3 > > user => k ; still doesn't exist > Unable to resolve symbol: k in this context > > U -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
