Hi, During the discussions of the topic "Jython Interoperability problem", Mikhail Kryshen suggested implementations of Clojure data structures outside Clojure:
>Clojure's data structures modified for use outside of Clojure: >http://github.com/krukow/clj-ds >Persistent analogue of the Java Collections Framework: >http://code.google.com/p/pcollections/ I've been using the Clojure libraries (immutable collections and Refs) in Java programs (a version of the Manchester OWL-API). Reading the documentation for the Clojure replacements suggested by Mikhail, they imply that the implementations inside the official Clojure libraries are inefficient (in terms of speed and memory) if used in Java only applications (no Clojure code) AND that, in the future, they may demand that all of the Clojure machinery be loaded with them. Is there any official view/police about this issue? The question I need to answer is: Should I keep using the Clojure libraries in my programs or migrate them to some other implementation of immutable collections + Refs (STM) + (maybe) actors? Advices are welcomed :-) DIlvan Moreira -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
