Yes, but why isn't persistence of <em>closures</em> generating more interest. ;)
Persistence is "solved", if you're OK with not being truly ACID... Seriously though, everyone has their own backends. I don't think anyone wants to be tied to BDB JE. Would there be interest in lazy-loading and -unloading data structures? On Nov 27, 7:35 pm, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mark <markaddle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi - > > > I'm surprised your work doesn't generate more interest from folks. I > > wish I had more time, I would definitely jump in and help. > > Persistence doesn't seem to generate much interest in general. I > posted my own stab at a way of persisting the ref world > near-transparently a few weeks ago and it sank without a ripple. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
