On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Alyssa Kwan <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but why isn't persistence of <em>closures</em> generating more > interest. ;) > > Persistence is "solved", if you're OK with not being truly ACID... > > Seriously though, everyone has their own backends. I don't think > anyone wants to be tied to BDB JE. > > Would there be interest in lazy-loading and -unloading data > structures?
That code I wrote does sort of do lazy loading and unloading data structures. That is, it can be used to make structures that are loaded in pieces, on demand, as an algorithm reaches a particular piece, and that can be referenced without loading them just from hanging onto the thing's address somewhere. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
