>> yet you are accusing people of criticizing you just because they feel you >> should do a bit more >> research about this. > > I'm asking them to explain themselves better, and their responses are > not any kind of explanation.
Please try putting yourself in their shoes. They have already explained themselves the best they could, and it's all documented (in the archives, the wiki, etc). Why do you think they should do it again? Anyway, as Rich said in his response, the die has been cast and it can't be changed at the moment. You will have to either accept it or stick to Clojure 1.2.x. I am requesting you to end the discussion here. Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
