On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> yet you are accusing people of criticizing you just because they feel you >>> should do a bit more >>> research about this. >> >> I'm asking them to explain themselves better, and their responses are >> not any kind of explanation. > > Please try putting yourself in their shoes. They have already > explained themselves the best they could, and it's all documented
Then why didn't the link I followed to the summary assuage my doubts? > Why do you think they should do it again? Anyway, as Rich said in his > response, the die has been cast and it can't be changed at the moment. That same summary implied there were two proposals, not just one; in one of them, + and the like retain their current behavior and it is +' and the like that you use if you want potentially faster math. > I am requesting you to end the discussion here. I reserve the right to respond in my own defense if personally attacked, and to respond if asked a question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
