On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Trevor <tcr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for responding, but I know all this. > > 1. I know how to pass string and symbols into functions and I know how > to coerce. > 2. I don't want to bind the name, I want to interpret the name as a > symbol
In what sense? Apparently (symbol the-name) doesn't suffice for your purposes. I think we need to know what those purposes actually are, in much more detail. > 3. CL has anonymous macros, so why do you think CL has them - because > they're not useful? I didn't claim they weren't useful. I said, and I quote, "I'm not sure why you'd want one". That's not quite the same thing, because it allows for the possibility that there is a good use for them that has thus far escaped my notice. If you know of such a use, by all means describe it here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
