On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Mike Meyer
<mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:27:11 -0500
> Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mike Meyer
>> <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:26:49 +0100
>> > Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
>> >> http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/AreWeThereYet.pdf
>> >
>> > Thanks for the link.
>> >
>> > To bad it made Tufte kill a kitten. I had forgotten there was a
>> > textual representation with a lower information density per bit than
>> > video.
>>
>> Did you mean a higher information density per bit?
>
> No, I meant lower.

But I just explained how a bloated presentation of the same
information has a lower (useful) information density per bit than does
a textual one.

> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

This is a bit ironic in context. You appear to champion big clunky
video and pdf files in place of html+inline images documentation on
the web, but for email, the lighter the better? That seems a little
bit inconsistent to me. :)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to