On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Baishampayan Ghose <b.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> And why would it come up as a page full of ads (mostly pretty scammy
>>>> looking ads, like fake Windows messageboxes and such) instead of a
>>>> Host Unknown error?!
>>>
>>> Because the registrar for clojure.org chose to resolve lapsed domain
>>> names to a page that it thinks could make it some money instead of
>>> failing. If you look closely (assuming you can still get the page),
>>> you're liable to find a "buy this domain" link somewhere on it.
>>
>> That's pretty evil. Their behavior makes Clojure look unprofessional,
>> or even hacked, and is confusing to users trying to reach the page.
>> It's like going to your local mall and finding a big, neon-encrusted
>> casino or something in its stead, rather than either the mall or a
>> vacant lot.
>
> Most domain registrars do that. What fix do you suggest to make
> Clojure look more "professional"?

Renewing the domain registration *before* it expires in future would
be a start; and using a registrar that won't play dirty tricks and
will just give a clean Host Unknown error page for nonexistent
domains.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to