In the alpha7 release the defrecord macro was changed to generate a
couple of auxiliary functions (for a record R) named map->R and ->R.
The first takes a map and returns a function of its contents.  The
second takes the same number of arguments as the record constructor.
It's the definition of this second function that is reporting an
error.  It's easy enough to fix, but I guess the question is should it
be fixed?  That is, do people define records with 19+ fields?  Does
this pose a problem for existing code?

:F

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to