On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Fogus <mefo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the alpha7 release the defrecord macro was changed to generate a > couple of auxiliary functions (for a record R) named map->R and ->R. > The first takes a map and returns a function of its contents. The > second takes the same number of arguments as the record constructor. > It's the definition of this second function that is reporting an > error. It's easy enough to fix, but I guess the question is should it > be fixed? That is, do people define records with 19+ fields? Does > this pose a problem for existing code? > > :F
Java allows classes to define up to 255 fields right? Seems like defrecord/deftype should at least support that limit. The use case would be for certain code generation scenarios. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
