On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMO, records should support anything maps support -- in particular, > they should support near-arbitrary numbers of entries. If performance is not a concern I don't see the point of not justing plain maps + multimethods. None of these problems apply there. On that note, instead of suggesting improvements that would make things slower, I'd like to hear people suggest solutions that give the desired generality without sacrificing any performance whatsoever. Bonus point if the desired solution is actually faster than what we currently have. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
