On 5 July 2011 06:34, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was using it in the sense typically meant in phrases like "source
>> code repository", as seems reasonable given the context, but oh well.
>
> If you're using git, "source code repository" could easily be local
> and not require an Internet connection... so I think it depends on
> your experience :)

The same goes for CVS or Subversion or Mercurial and probably various
other "source code repositories".  If you want to network them you
can, but you have to do something extra (e.g. run cvs-pserver or
mod_dav_svn or svnserve or hg serve etc.)

Things like Debian package archives are the same.  They have a
particular structure and set of metadata and they may or may not be
available over the network (via FTP or HTTP).  If you have one locally
(e.g. on CD) you can use it without setting up an FTP server or web
server, but of course then nobody else can use it from their machine.

> In the OP comment, I certainly took repository to just mean "somewhere
> you store stuff" and hence it could easily be local...

I take it to me "somewhere you can store stuff in a particular
structure perhaps with metadata" so that maven knows what's there and
how to set up class paths and whatever else it needs to do with it.

-- 
Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to