On Jul 26, 2:01 pm, semperos <daniel.l.grego...@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on the majority of posts in this thread, I think you can see you're in > the minority, both with regards to your opinions of ClojureScript and with > regards to how this community should behave. Here's one more person who > doesn't appreciate the attitude your posts embody. Rich, and everyone else > on this list and everyone on this list <http://clojure.org/contributing> have > put serious and brilliant efforts into developing Clojure. There's a lot > more to learn from Clojure and its community than there is to criticize, in > my opinion. > > I have never been involved in a more helpful or welcoming open source > community than Clojure, and I'm involved in many. Wash your hands and be > gone, if you're not interested in learning from people who have spent their > hammock time coming up with the cutting edge in language design and > implementation. > > Or just start coding and make things better. > > -Daniel
Oh I will be washing my hands and be gone for sure, as coding and making things better is precisely what I offered in my OP, which was taken as a "threat" and I was told to start a "separate mailing list" for it; perhaps this community welcomes folks who don't know any better than to be invariably effusive for everything in it, but for those who do it it quite evidently has not been. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
