Hi Shoeb On 7 August 2011 01:51, Shoeb Bhinderwala <shoeb.bhinderw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not guessing. I measured the performance of the query using plain > Java and Clojure.
That's not what he was saying. In your first message you said: >>> I am assuming that most of the extra time is spent converting the results >>> into Clojure maps. Colin replied to say: >> That assumption needs checking - first rule of performance analysis: check, >> don't guess :) He is not disputing that the Clojure code takes longer to run. He's just saying that it is better to check what is causing it or to verify your assumptions. Anyway, as Stuart says, profiling is probably your best option. -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
