You are right Michael. I misunderstood Colin's statement. As Stuart suggested I am profiling the code and will share the results with the group soon.
On Aug 8, 4:33 am, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Shoeb > > On 7 August 2011 01:51, Shoeb Bhinderwala <shoeb.bhinderw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am not guessing. I measured the performance of the query using plain > > Java and Clojure. > > That's not what he was saying. In your first message you said: > > >>> I am assuming that most of the extra time is spent converting the results > >>> into Clojure maps. > > Colin replied to say: > > >> That assumption needs checking - first rule of performance analysis: check, > >> don't guess :) > > He is not disputing that the Clojure code takes longer to run. He's > just saying that it is better to check what is causing it or to verify > your assumptions. > > Anyway, as Stuart says, profiling is probably your best option. > > -- > Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
