Not really. In _Let Over Lambda_'s section on reader macros, he creates a reader macro #`(foo bar a1 a2) that expands to (lambda (a1 a2) `(foo bar ,a1 ,a2)), but this is not possible in Clojure. A nice example of something you can do with reader macros, in case Clojure ever gets them.
And you could certainly write it yourself as a regular macro, at the expense of a syntax that's almost as long as the (fn [x] `(foo)) syntax. But really, that construct is very short, and worrying about the extra six characters you would save by writing it with #() seems like wasted effort to me. On Oct 19, 1:14 pm, Razvan Rotaru <razvan.rot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just wondering is there a nicer way to write this: > > (defmacro my-macro [& body] > (map (fn[x] `(my-fun ~x)) body)) > > I'd like to use the anonymous function literall #(), but this won't > work: > > (defmacro my-macro [& body] > (map #(`(my-fun ~%)) body)) > > So if you have some suggestion, I'd be glad to hear it. > > Thanks, > Razvan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
