In common lisp for fun I have replicated the #(+ 1 %) syntax without reader
macros as (@ + 1 %), I could try to convert that to clojure to see if it
suits you...

Em terça-feira, 1 de novembro de 2011, Razvan Rotaru escreveu:

> Yeah, you are probably right. But I figured asking never hurts...
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Razvan
>
> On Oct 19, 10:50 pm, Alan Malloy <a...@malloys.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Not really. In _Let Over Lambda_'s section on reader macros, he
> > creates a reader macro #`(foo bar a1 a2) that expands to (lambda (a1
> > a2) `(foo bar ,a1 ,a2)), but this is not possible in Clojure. A nice
> > example of something you can do with reader macros, in case Clojure
> > ever gets them.
> >
> > And you could certainly write it yourself as a regular macro, at the
> > expense of a syntax that's almost as long as the (fn [x] `(foo))
> > syntax. But really, that construct is very short, and worrying about
> > the extra six characters you would save by writing it with #() seems
> > like wasted effort to me.
> >
> > On Oct 19, 1:14 pm,RazvanRotaru <razvan.rot...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> > > I'm just wondering is there a nicer way to write this:
> >
> > > (defmacro my-macro [& body]
> > >     (map (fn[x] `(my-fun ~x)) body))
> >
> > > I'd like to use the anonymous function literall #(), but this won't
> > > work:
> >
> > > (defmacro my-macro [& body]
> > >     (map #(`(my-fun ~%)) body))
> >
> > > So if you have some suggestion, I'd be glad to hear it.
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > >Razvan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com<javascript:;>
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to