> doesn't show any effect of the for. > The only difference is the additional statement at the end. > I can not imagine how this statement sequentially behind can influence > the for.
for returns a lazy sequence. In the first case, in printing out the result to the REPL, the lazy sequence is realized, and in the second, the result is discarded so it is never realized. jack. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
