Ahhhhh, thank you, .... so a newbie question. But helped me a lot. Andreas
On Jan 18, 10:26 pm, Jack Moffitt <j...@metajack.im> wrote: > > doesn't show any effect of the for. > > The only difference is the additional statement at the end. > > I can not imagine how this statement sequentially behind can influence > > the for. > > for returns a lazy sequence. In the first case, in printing out the > result to the REPL, the lazy sequence is realized, and in the second, > the result is discarded so it is never realized. > > jack. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
