A treasure!

I will from now on start to jot down whatever I do also.

/Linus

2012/2/16 Sean Neilan <s...@seanneilan.com>

> Of course, I won't be able to write the entire Recipe Book by myself. I
> will contribute all the recipes I have discovered with test cases.
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Sean Neilan <s...@seanneilan.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm working on something like this by keeping notes on everything I've
>> encountered so far in Clojure 1.3.0.
>>
>> Please understand that these are* personal notes* and as such are very,
>> very messy.
>>
>> http://seanneilan.com/Clojure.html
>>
>> When I have the time, I will volunteer to clean up my notes and turn it
>> into a Clojure 1.3.0 Recipe Book in the same vein as the Python
>> Documentation. It will be a mix of Java and Clojure that tells you what to
>> do and how to do it. No more no less.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Gregg Williams <greg...@innerpaths.net
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would it kill somebody to write a library of simple functions that
>>>> would answer most beginners' simple needs, then have it "blessed" as
>>>> canonical? I'd write it myself, but I still don't know enough! If
>>>> every beginner has to painfully figure these things out, most
>>>> beginners are going to bail--which means that Clojure remains a niche
>>>> language, unknown to a lot of people who could have brought their
>>>> considerable creativity to the Clojure community.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We are patiently waiting for *you* to do / start / lead this. If it's a
>>> real paint point for enough people - folks will happily contribute, you
>>> don't need to know / think of everything. I've found this to be case with
>>> ClojureScript, core.match, and core.logic. I'm working on ClojureScript
>>> support for core.match and core.logic and I happily welcome any patches
>>> that will make them work on the CLR.
>>>
>>> It's tiresome to hear people complain about something they do not
>>> contribute anything towards.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>   --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to