Hi *, I'm developing a Clojure bridge to the Alfresco APIs, where I use a protocol, Node, to extend a class coming from the original Java API (NodeRef). Now, one of the project contributors proposed to add type hints to the return values of the Clojure API functions, so to have, e.g.:
(defn ^Node user-home [..] ..) The sole declared purpose of it would be to document the user-home function to return a class that fulfills the Node protocol, not caring about reflection at all. Now, while there's a little voice from the back of my head that tells me it's not quite an idiomatic approach to the problem, I've not really any strong counter argument to it. Would you consider such strategy good/bad/great/harmful? Is it used already by any other project out there? Thanks, c. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
