Maybe you are already doing this, but as soon as I get into "This doesn't seem possible" territory, I run a "lein clean". That has resolved the problem for me several times.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Jim foo.bar <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28/02/13 14:34, Marko Topolnik wrote: > > So it makes sense that it blows up only when you try to actually run the > code. > > > It doesn't low up when I try to run the code...as I said, I can easily > navigate into any namespace from the repl and run any code that I > want....so there is no problem compiling /running the actual code. I seem > to be getting this error at random occasions without changing any code!!!! > This is what's driving me nuts! > > 2 minutes ago I did: > > *> lein2 test hotel_nlp.core * [ALL-GOOD] > > lein test hotel_nlp.core > > Testing hotel_nlp.core > > Ran 0 tests containing 0 assertions. > 0 failures, 0 errors. > > then I did: > > *> lein2 test hotel_nlp.helper * [ALL-GOOD]* > > *lein test hotel_nlp.helper > > Testing hotel_nlp.helper > > Ran 7 tests containing 30 assertions. > 0 failures, 0 errors.* > * > so it *seems* everything is working fine...However, without changing any > code: > > *>lein2 test hotel_nlp.core hotel_nlp.helper* [BAD] > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.VerifyError: (class: > hotel_nlp/concretions/models/Workflow, method: run signature: > ()Ljava/lang/Object;) Unable to pop operand off an empty stack, > compiling:(hotel_nlp/concretions/models.clj:68:1) > > then immediately after I did the same > > *>lein2 test hotel_nlp.core hotel_nlp.helper* [ALL-GOOD] > > lein test hotel_nlp.core > > Testing hotel_nlp.core > > lein test hotel_nlp.helper > > Testing hotel_nlp.helper > > Ran 7 tests containing 30 assertions. > 0 failures, 0 errors. > > That is what I mean it occurs at random...Has anyone ever had this before? > > @Dave: > > You're absolutely right Dave, I should have been be more specific in the > subject heading. I do apologise though on behalf of my frustration which is > to blame for this! It won't happen again.... > > Jim > > > > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.