On Mar 21, 2013, at 1:54 PM, Razvan Rotaru <razvan.rot...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm curious, why doesn't toString of clojure.lang.LazySeq return the entire 
> sequence as a String, and returns the Java pointer instead?

I don't know, but perhaps it's to avoid problems with infinite sequences? 
(Although it's interesting that `(range)` produces a lazy sequence and `(str 
(range))` runs out of heap.)

> Is there an alternative to the code above (preferably simple and elegant), 
> which will return the etire sequence?

I don't know if it's elegant, but:

user=> (str (list* (map + [1 2 3])))
"(1 2 3)"

--------
Looking for employment as a Clojure programmer
Latest book: /Functional Programming for the Object-Oriented Programmer/
https://leanpub.com/fp-oo

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to