On Apr 28, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote: > > For problems that are embarassingly parallel (little or no communication or > shared memory between threads), there is no law of the universe that says > that GC must have a sequential bottleneck in it. A GC better tuned for such > problems could be developed, and perhaps already has. > > Lee, did you ever get a trial for Azul's Zing JVM to see if its GC was any > better in this regard?
I think that my colleague Josiah Erikson did try some other JVM, on a suggestion from the Clojure list or the meetup. I don't recall the details except that it didn't solve our problem. I'll ping him and report back if there's more to share. Thanks, -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
