Thanks - I wasn't sure how much to assume so that's appreciated. I will definitely check for the correctness of the predicate vs the date - that would really be a face palm!
OTOH I feel good that I'm actually writing sane Clojure code even if it is broken with my data ;-) Ray On Tuesday, 28 May 2013 23:46:34 UTC+2, Michael Gardner wrote: > > On May 28, 2013, at 15:05 , Mond Ray <mondr...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Quite a few views but no bites ... what have I done wrong in asking this > question? If you can't help with the problem would you please take a moment > to help me understand what has put you off? > > It would help to post less code, to make it easier for people to zero in > on the critical parts. For example, it's not necessary to include > 'fetch-atom-chunk and 'fetch-atom-feed since you can just post some sample > parsed data (which you did). > > When I try running your predicate against your sample data, the predicate > returns false because 2013-05-27 isn't after the feed's :UPDATED date. > Might you have the arguments to 'after? reversed? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
