On Aug 22, 2013 6:25 AM, "Jim" <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: > this is funny! I thought about this approach but I originally considered it to be a clever hack rather than the official way to do this...
If you need some data persisted or sent over the wire, then it should probably be considered part of a value, and maybe metadata isn't an appropriate place to store it. It could go into the record, as in Meikel's workaround, or in some wrapper structure, if you need to maintain the behavior that records with distinct metadata can compare =. (Or you could embed the data in the record but `#(dissoc % :data-fka-meta)` only when you want to compare while disregarding that data.) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
