On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:30:23 AM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: > > It's also worth > pointing out that a lot of US companies won't use GPL-licensed > software (and won't pay for a closed source version), and many aren't > comfortable with LGPL either. >
I don't see why a company would have any problem at all with *using* LGPL'd software, even in a product. However, I can see the possible complaints if they wanted to *modify* it and then distribute their modified version (since that would then require distributing the modified source along with it). -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
