IIRC in that particular part of the talk he was specifically talking about (non-self describing) protocol buffers and not JSON.
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 10:00:09 PM UTC+2, Brian Craft wrote: > > Regarding Rich's talk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROor6_NGIWU), can > anyone explain the points he's trying to make about self-describing and > extensible data formats, with the JSON and google examples? > > He argues that google couldn't exist if the web depended on out-of-band > schemas. He gives as an example of such a schema a JSON encoding where an > out-of-band agreement is made that field names with substring "date" refer > to string-encoded dates. > > However, this is exactly the sort of thing google does. It finds dates, > and other data types, heuristically, and not through the formats of the web > being self-describing or extensible. > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
