Good points.  But the "identity" thing is still what gets me.  What is the 
identity of an intersection?

Like you said it can't be #{}.  If you seed an intersection with #{} you 
get #{}, so you can't intersect from the empty set.  The identity for an 
intersection is whatever the common element is, but how would you know that?

On Friday, January 24, 2014 7:03:40 PM UTC-5, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>
> Intersection is associative and commutative: (intersection A B) = 
> (intersection B A) and (intersection A (intersection B C)) = (intersection 
> (intersection A B) C) = the elements common to all three sets. So it's 
> actually perfectly well-founded for use with reducers, at least in 
> principle, and intersecting A B C D can be parallelized sensibly by 
> parallel intersecting A B and C D and then intersecting the two resulting 
> sets.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Jarrod Swart <jcs...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> If I understand you correctly I am in agreement.  I don't think you could 
>> take this problem to clojure.core.reducers/reduce or fold because the 
>> problem is inherently sequential is it not?
>>
>> The reduction is basically (intersection (intersection (intersection A B) 
>> C) D).  
>>
>> I was curious of this myself, how do I abstract out the order of the 
>> (reduce set/intersection ...).  I couldn't think of one.
>>
>> Breaking this problem out into 'parallel' units of reduction isn't 
>> possible because the problem is dependent on order.  Which reducers can't 
>> have, or so I think after what I have read today.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 3:56:23 PM UTC-5, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>>
>>> An interesting question this raises is if there is any sensible way to 
>>> define (intersection). It would need to behave as an identity element for 
>>> intersection, so would need to behave as a set (so, (set? (intersection)) 
>>> => truthy) that contained everything (so, (contains? (intersection) foo) => 
>>> foo no matter what foo is; (partial contains? (intersection)) => identity). 
>>> The problem would be what to do with seq? Ideally an infinite seq that will 
>>> produce any particular value after finite time would be produced, but 
>>> there's no way to sensibly produce "any particular value" given the wide 
>>> variety of constructor semantics, builders, factory methods, things not 
>>> known to this particular runtime instance but that conceptually exist 
>>> somewhere, etc.; of course, the seq return is a dummy of sorts anyway since 
>>> you couldn't really use it sensibly to it might as well just return 
>>> (range). Printing should likely be overridden to just print 
>>> "(intersection)" rather than b0rk the REPL with a neverending stream of 
>>> integers (or whatever).
>>>
>>> But then it also subtly violates another property of Clojure set 
>>> objects: if (= a b), (not (identical? a b)), and (identical? (a-set a) a), 
>>> then (identical? (a-set b) a) and thus (not (identical? (a-set b) b)). The 
>>> latter is true under the hypothesis for every "real" set but would be false 
>>> for (intersection).
>>>
>>> Perhaps this is why (intersection) is not supported at this time, even 
>>> though (union) returns an empty set object, the identity element for the 
>>> union operation.
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Jarrod Swart <jcs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah cool, thanks for posting your solution!
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 3:29:49 PM UTC-5, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jarrod Swart <jcs...@gmail.com> writes: 
>>>>>
>>>>> > The reason you can't get this to work is that r/map returns a 
>>>>> <reducible> 
>>>>> > not a <coll> for reduce to operate on. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, indeed.  I couldn't see the forest for the trees. 
>>>>>
>>>>> > I'm not sure of a solution because I'm not familiar with 
>>>>> > core.reducers. 
>>>>>
>>>>> This works: 
>>>>>
>>>>>   (reduce set/intersection (r/foldcat (r/map set [[1 2] [3 1] [1 
>>>>> 3]]))) 
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye, 
>>>>> Tassilo 
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to