On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Sean Corfield <s...@corfield.org> wrote: > FWIW, I find the language of Expectations to be much better suited to > describing the desired behaviors of a system I want to build than the > assertion-based language of clojure.test - so for me it's about > test-before, not test-after.
Thinking more on this, when I originally wrote expectations, I was doing all TDD at the time (in IntelliJ). The main focus on expectations syntax as always been around maintainability, and my tdd or test-after opinions would always take a back seat to maintainability. I'm glad it works well for you Sean; hopefully your team is just as happy. =) Cheers, Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
