2014-02-28 14:35 GMT+04:00 xavi <xavi.caba...@gmail.com>: > When asked (a year ago) why I didn't use Monger I said I prefer CongoMongo > because it's smaller and so probably easier to understand >
Monger's API follows MongoDB shell. CongoMongo invents a completely new API. I'll let you decide which one is easier to understand. > > Not having used Monger, I don't know what you mean by "much richer > composable DSL", but in general I don't like using specific DSLs for > something that it already has its own language (I mean that MongoDB already > has a query language, so I prefer to use something as close as possible to > that, not another abstraction on top of that with its own limitations and > problems that at the ends doesn't save me from having to learn the original > language). Monger's query DSL is documented and completely optional: http://clojuremongodb.info/articles/querying.html#monger_query_dsl If you don't use it, you query/update/etc using the same constructs as in Mongo shell. -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
