On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Zach Tellman <ztell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I'm reading this correctly, you're using non-blocking thread pools for > blocking operations on the sockets. Given more than N connections (last > time I looked the thread pool's size was 42), you risk deadlock or at the > very least poor average throughput. I'd thought the thread pool's size was a function of your core count plus some constant, which I believe is 42. But yes, that is a constraint, and deadlock is a risk with too many concurrent connections. I haven't tried to measure throughput yet but that seems like a reasonable next step. Thanks for the code review! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
