Correction after actually trying it out: In this case you might prefer to write something like (transduce xform > (comp group-by-xf +) ...) instead > of (transduce (comp xform group-by-xf) + ...) . [...] >
The first variant must use a valid rf, and needs to be written as (transduce xform ((group-by-xf odd?) +) ...) In the second it should be e.g. (comp xform (group-by-xf odd?)) -- Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
