Am Freitag, 17. Oktober 2014 15:01:51 UTC+2 schrieb Daniel James: > > [...] > Your function is good for use with `reduce`, but only that. I hope I’ve > helped build an intuition for why it’s actually impossible to implement > ‘group by’ as a transducer. >
This is correct. Unlike you, I am exclusively talking about the reduce case: transformations on reducing functions, and the general init-reduce-complete cycle represented by the 0/2/1-arities of the reducing functions. My use case is a reduce using the reducing function (xform f), but by default transduce does not pick this reducing function's 0-arity for its init value, but rather uses (f) instead. -- Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
