On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 5:01:47 PM UTC-4, Charlie Griefer wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Fluid Dynamics <a209...@trbvm.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, I think some people still have not grasped the scale of what 
> I'm doing, namely how small it is. Small, experimental, limited to one 
> person, and so forth. Version control, I repeat, would be MASSIVE overkill 
> under the circumstances. It would make barely any less sense to reach for 
> version control before writing a "hello, world" program.
>
> IF the project grows enough and is successful enough, then I might 
> consider creating a github account and basing it there.
>
>
> As has been mentioned already, git != github.
>
> Really, if the risk of losing your changes to this file are enough to 
> warrant the tirade that you’ve been on, it’s enough of a risk to warrant 
> doing a git init in the directory.
>

It's not "doing a git init" that concerns me. It's:
* Finding and installing yet another piece of software
* Learning at least the basic ins and outs of that piece of software
* Configuring it, since it sounds like commandline stuff that probably does 
not simply work OOTB without setting PATH and probably fiddling with other 
things
* Figuring out how to configure CCW to integrate with that other piece of 
software -- if that's even possible
* Manually mucking about checking out, copying the files into CCW's 
workspace, and later copying the files back out and checking in if not
* Extra steps around every file save or open, namely whatever is needed to 
do checkins and checkouts from version control.
* Dealing with whatever subset actually happens of the new 
things-that-can-go-wrong that get introduced by all this added complexity.

One warning flag already apparent is the very phrase "doing a git init in 
the directory" in your post. Sounds like I'd be having to do a lot more 
fiddling around at the command line than I currently do. Infinitely more, 
in fact, since the current amount is zero. :)

I remain wholly unconvinced that it's worth the hassle for a project this 
small.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to