On Jun 20, 2015, at 3:58 AM, Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, June 20, 2015 at 4:15:30 AM UTC+1, Sean Corfield wrote: > (.getTypeName (Class/forName "[Ljava.lang.String;")) > ;;=> "java.lang.String[]" — that is more readable! > > Thanks, that's helpful for me. By chance do you know if the class is > natively recoverable from the TypeName for Clojure/Java? Class/forName can't > roundtrip that string.
I’m not sure what you mean? The type of the array displays as [Ljava.lang.String; and when you do Class/forName on "[Ljava.lang.String;" you get back a Class that represents an array of String. The TypeName is just a human-readable form, not an actual Class name. Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
