You might like some of immutant's stuff: http://immutant.org/documentation/2.0.2/apidoc/guide-transactions.html
Even though it's called caching, it can be used as a kv-store. They do offer persistence and transaction. HTH On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 10:59:09 AM UTC-4, Jeremy Vuillermet wrote: > > Hello, > > With the rise of Om, Reagent or re-frame for that matter, I'm using more a > more the single state atom pattern in my clojurescript app. > So much so that for my current application, I've been using atoms server > side because my apps are split in really small app that only need to store > few data - things like mini multiplayer game or polls. > At the very least, it's useful while developing so I don't have to think > too much about the storage layer. > > While looking for ways to keep my atom like interface while persisting my > data, I found http://avout.io/ "Distributed state for clojure" which > would be perfect for my use case. > I also found things like https://github.com/alandipert/enduro : "durable > atom in clojure" > or https://github.com/torsten/zookeeper-atom > > All of them does not seem active anymore and I wonder why and what's the > current status for those kind of thing. > > Are those solution not ready for production ? > Do you eventually end up with a traditional database so nobody need that ? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.