[Inconsequential email] On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Mars0i <marsh...@logical.net> wrote:
> "any?" wasn't the only option. I would have gone with something obvious > like "always-true", or "yes", or even something possibly too-clever like > "arg-or-not-arg?" or "or-not-this?" These last might be confusing, but not > misleading, as "any?" is. > > I like "yes" - there's a close Unix precedent too. Not 1-to-1, but close enough in spirit. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
