Oh, one other question - does :refer-clojure in CLJS refer both macros and functions in the same declaration? i.e. I could do something like:
(ns foo (:refer-clojure :only [defn reduce])) On 10 June 2014 01:27, Colin Fleming <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks David. I think I'll implement this the way it should work then, and > users will see an unresolved symbol warning if they use the incorrect > forms. As things get fancier I can provide some explanation and an > intention to migrate the incorrect forms to the correct ones. > > Hopefully this should be done sometime this week. It's looking pretty nice > :-) > > > On 10 June 2014 00:21, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Colin Fleming >> <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'm working on CLJS symbol resolution for Cursive. There are a lot of >> corners where it's hard to figure out from the doc how they should work - >> I've looked through the code but I'm not sure I've got it all right. >> > >> > I've seen several times in the group here that / should only be used >> for CLJS namespaces, never for JS properties. So (Array/isArray ...) should >> be (js/Array.isArray ...) instead. Is this correct? ClojureScript: Up and >> running states that / can be used for JS module objects, which I take to >> mean root-level objects - their example is (Raphael/color....) from the >> Raphael JS library. Their discussion of the differences in this-binding is >> confusing since it seems that / should be used for JS but only in the case >> of top-level objects. >> >> This is correct. / in ClojureScript should only be used for >> namespaces. Any place this isn't the case that isn't one of the >> exceptional cases in ClojureScript should be considered an oversight. >> >> > confirm-ns in analyzer.clj contains a list of namespaces which should >> not warn, i.e. which are implicitly required, as I understand it >> (cljs.core, goog, Math, goog.string). CLJS itself contains examples like >> (Math/floor...) - does this mean that JS module objects are considered >> namespaces? Is this true of provide'd Google Closure namespaces (e.g. >> goog.string, which is also used like this in the CLJS source)? >> >> It's probably worth making an exception for Math for code portability >> reasons. The others are proper namespaces. ClojureScript doesn't know >> anything about "JS Modules". If a JS library is not required as a >> namespace then it should be accessed in the standard way, no /. >> >> > Using e.g. :include-macros, it's possible to have the same alias refer >> both to a CLJS and CLJ namespace simultaneously. I'm assuming that in this >> case, if a symbol name were to conflict, that the macro form would take >> precedence in the head of a list (since macroexpansion happens before >> evaluation) but the CLJS form would take precedence everywhere else. Is >> this correct? >> >> That's correct and it's actually something we take advantage of to do >> inlining arithmetic functions etc. >> >> > I'm assuming that my-namespace.cljs does not implicitly refer macros >> from my-namespace.clj - is this correct? >> >> That is correct. >> >> David >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> > > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
