That is correct. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Colin Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, one other question - does :refer-clojure in CLJS refer both macros and > functions in the same declaration? i.e. I could do something like: > > (ns foo > (:refer-clojure :only [defn reduce])) > > > On 10 June 2014 01:27, Colin Fleming <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks David. I think I'll implement this the way it should work then, and >> users will see an unresolved symbol warning if they use the incorrect forms. >> As things get fancier I can provide some explanation and an intention to >> migrate the incorrect forms to the correct ones. >> >> Hopefully this should be done sometime this week. It's looking pretty nice >> :-) >> >> >> On 10 June 2014 00:21, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Colin Fleming >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I'm working on CLJS symbol resolution for Cursive. There are a lot of >>> > corners where it's hard to figure out from the doc how they should work - >>> > I've looked through the code but I'm not sure I've got it all right. >>> > >>> > I've seen several times in the group here that / should only be used >>> > for CLJS namespaces, never for JS properties. So (Array/isArray ...) >>> > should >>> > be (js/Array.isArray ...) instead. Is this correct? ClojureScript: Up and >>> > running states that / can be used for JS module objects, which I take to >>> > mean root-level objects - their example is (Raphael/color....) from the >>> > Raphael JS library. Their discussion of the differences in this-binding is >>> > confusing since it seems that / should be used for JS but only in the case >>> > of top-level objects. >>> >>> This is correct. / in ClojureScript should only be used for >>> namespaces. Any place this isn't the case that isn't one of the >>> exceptional cases in ClojureScript should be considered an oversight. >>> >>> > confirm-ns in analyzer.clj contains a list of namespaces which should >>> > not warn, i.e. which are implicitly required, as I understand it >>> > (cljs.core, >>> > goog, Math, goog.string). CLJS itself contains examples like >>> > (Math/floor...) >>> > - does this mean that JS module objects are considered namespaces? Is this >>> > true of provide'd Google Closure namespaces (e.g. goog.string, which is >>> > also >>> > used like this in the CLJS source)? >>> >>> It's probably worth making an exception for Math for code portability >>> reasons. The others are proper namespaces. ClojureScript doesn't know >>> anything about "JS Modules". If a JS library is not required as a >>> namespace then it should be accessed in the standard way, no /. >>> >>> > Using e.g. :include-macros, it's possible to have the same alias refer >>> > both to a CLJS and CLJ namespace simultaneously. I'm assuming that in this >>> > case, if a symbol name were to conflict, that the macro form would take >>> > precedence in the head of a list (since macroexpansion happens before >>> > evaluation) but the CLJS form would take precedence everywhere else. Is >>> > this >>> > correct? >>> >>> That's correct and it's actually something we take advantage of to do >>> inlining arithmetic functions etc. >>> >>> > I'm assuming that my-namespace.cljs does not implicitly refer macros >>> > from my-namespace.clj - is this correct? >>> >>> That is correct. >>> >>> David >>> >>> -- >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "ClojureScript" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> >> > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
-- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
