On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kyle Cordes <k...@kylecordes.com> wrote: > I wasn’t speaking in favor of those settings, just pointing out that there > are various constraints. That is a problem with have a lot of settings > available, we end up with different tools supporting different > semi-overlapping subsets of the settings. > > Personally I’d be happy if all except the most useful settings were removed. > Maybe only :none and :advanced are actually still needed in 2014.
No plans to remove anything. If tools are passing bad settings to the ClojureScript compiler or don't reliably support :none, I just would not use these tools. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
