On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, David Nolen wrote: > No plans to remove anything. If tools are passing bad settings to the > ClojureScript compiler or don't reliably support :none, I just would > not use these tools. >
I think it is all a solved problem today. I have a process working well with :none, and the source map stuff is excellent. Some tool I used a while back did not support :none, and I dropped it, just as you described. I was just thinking historically the other settings were a bit of an “attractive nuisance”. Sorry to sound argumentative before, I am a huge fan of all this stuff. -- Kyle Cordes http://kylecordes.com -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
