On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Kyle Cordes <k...@kylecordes.com> wrote: > I think it is all a solved problem today. I have a process working well with > :none, and the source map stuff is excellent. Some tool I used a while back > did not support :none, and I dropped it, just as you described. I was just > thinking historically the other settings were a bit of an “attractive > nuisance”. Sorry to sound argumentative before, I am a huge fan of all this > stuff.
We're not arguing :) Just clarifying the points for other possible observers of this conversation who may be less knowledgeable about the rationale for the various knobs. It's unfortunate that we have so many knobs, but there's a few solid combinations and we should clearly communicate that in docs, libraries, tools, and discussions. David -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
